________________
रस-मीमांसा 464-7K is unnecessary. A gem does not cease to be a gem for any flaw in it. The adjective सगुण of शब्दाथ is also imprope1" for गुण relates to रस not to शव्द antl अर्थं as admitted by the author himself. The defence that Gunas have indirect relation ( 599) to per and अर्थ, which are the व्यंजक of रस is alst) ulltenable. Fer and 7 have no te therefore no T. & Tu have raifa relation. Mention of FIT is also unnecessary in the definition. For simply enhances to which is already existing. In short Tv and gier are both excellences (Fra) and not स्वरूप-घटक । (%) PRIHTA: 1 The definition too inclusive for it includes fra and agent also (uta 19). If by af he meant that then there is not possible objection. Then how can such expression of maciez as eqt uçteft dat मारे की etc. be called as काव्य ? Because of the रतिभाव suggested. The essence or soul of Poetry is a as admitted by old authorities. In F riप्रवृत्तिनिवृत्तिउपदेश the word उपदेश cloes not signify विधि o आज्ञा but कांतासंमित उपदेश ( The use
